In The Court of Sh. Chief Metropolitan Magistrates,
In The Matter of
ABC Complainant
Versus
XYZ Defendant
Memo of Parties
ABC …………………………….Complainant
F/F New
Versus
XYZ …………………………………Defendant
Street No.5
U/S 380/448/506/34 IPC
P.S. New
COMPLAINT UNDER SECTION 200 Cr.P.C. BEHALF OF COMPLAINANT
Most Respectfully Showeth :
1. That the complainant is residing of the aforesaid address with his family.
2. That the complainant is also running a shop no. 38A ABC Complex CP. Under the name of rahul store ana selling the goods.
3. That the accused no.1 is the allottee of the aforesaid shop and the complaint has paid Rs. 4, 00,000.00/- to the accused no-1 for running the his shop peacefully and without any kind of obstruction.
4. That the on 03-11-10 at about 10 p.m. in the night the complaint went to his house after closing his shop and when on the next day He come to the shop at about 1.30 pm on 04/11/10, He found that the looks of his shop put by him, have been changed and when the complainant tried to see inside the shop he was surprised to see that his articles/goods lying in the ship was funnd removed and the aforesaid illegal and unjustified act were committed by the aforesaid accused persons and they have removed the articles of the complainant from his shop and kept the same in their shop and they also put their locks on the shop of the complaint.
It is, therefore, most respectfully prayed that this Hon’ble court may kindly be pleased to sommon the accused persons u/s 448/380/506/34 IPC. Punished them according to law in view at the facts and circumstances mentioned above in the interest of justice.
Through
Dated Counsel
an employee got consented order from Div. Bench of High Court, for payment of interim relief u/s 17-B I.D. Act say @ amount 'a' per month which factually is less than last drawn - whereby employer agreed to reinstate the employee also.
ReplyDeleteThe employer after reporting of employee entered into a document reducing last-drawn wages by making off-the-cuff reference and overreaching the court, which was received by employee 'under protest & without prejudice'. The employer was requested in writing about two dozen times to pay right wages. But the employer was adamant. The employee filed case invoking inherent power u/s 482 crpc r/w 463, 464 & 420 IPC. After reply by employer and rejoinder by employee, the case was dismissed by the then presiding judge on the ground of jurisdiction with liberty to file under alternate remedy.
NOW THE QUESTION IS HOW TO PROCEED FURTHER. WHETHER IT CAN BE FILED U/S 200 CRPC CMM'S COURT AND IF SO HOW?
an employee got consented order from Div. Bench of High Court, for payment of interim relief u/s 17-B I.D. Act say @ amount 'a' per month which factually is less than last drawn - whereby employer agreed to reinstate the employee also.
ReplyDeleteThe employer after reporting of employee entered into a document reducing last-drawn wages by making off-the-cuff reference and overreaching the court, which was received by employee 'under protest & without prejudice'. The employer was requested in writing about two dozen times to pay right wages. But the employer was adamant. The employee filed case invoking inherent power u/s 482 crpc r/w 463, 464 & 420 IPC. After reply by employer and rejoinder by employee, the case was dismissed by the then presiding judge on the ground of jurisdiction with liberty to file under alternate remedy.
NOW THE QUESTION IS HOW TO PROCEED FURTHER. WHETHER IT CAN BE FILED U/S 200 CRPC CMM'S COURT AND IF SO HOW?
prince albert saskatchewan is voted the most racists and discriminative place in north america...
Delete